David Kampf Faces Reality with Contract Choices
Can anyone fault David Kampf for agreeing to a four-year contract that will pay him an average of $2.4 million per season to play hockey? It is hard to blame him for securing a limited no-trade clause as part of the deal.
The Likely Outcome
David Kampf may need to accept that his future is probably with the Marlies or not at all, given the nature of his contract and career prospects.
"Can anyone blame David Kampf for signing a four year deal that will see him on average earn $2.4M a season to play hockey?"
"Is it in any way David Kampf’s fault for somehow managing to also pick up a limited no trade clause in the process?"
Summary
David Kampf’s contract reflects a reasonable balance of financial security and limited movement, suggesting his best option might be staying with the Marlies.
Would you like the tone to be more formal or conversational?